NDS / Engineering in practice

Engineering studies.
Designed. Simulated. Explained.

Explore our SOLIDWORKS design and simulation studies—from thermal performance and vibration to tolerances, nonlinear contact and lightweight structures.

07Technical reports
CAD + FEAGeometry, analysis & engineering judgement

Study library / October 2026

From engineering question
to documented findings.

Each study connects the model, assumptions, result plots and design implications. Open the full report for the technical evidence and qualifications.

Thermal material selection — CAD model and simulation image thumbnailActual thermal result · Aluminium

01 / Thermal analysis

Thermal material selection

Compare stainless steel, aluminium and copper in a controlled conduction benchmark, then apply the method to thermal bridges and layered bases.

87.50°C → 27.56°CSteel to copper, identical 1 W bar benchmark

Steady-state conduction · Material comparison · Analytical checks

Heat-sink airflow — CAD model and simulation image thumbnailActual thermal result · 2 m/s airflow

02 / Flow & cooling

Heat-sink airflow

Compare a flat base, fins in still air and fins with prescribed airflow to show how geometry and convection influence cooling.

124.1°C → 44.7°CPeak solid temperature: flat base vs fins with 2 m/s airflow

Conjugate heat transfer · Temperature contours · Airflow visualization

Motor bracket — actual R4 harmonic stress result at 239.750 HzActual harmonic stress · Ribbed bracket

03 / Dynamics & fatigue

Motor-bracket vibration

Evaluate a baseline bracket and an integral-rib revision through modal, harmonic, shock, random-vibration and fatigue screening studies.

+56.8%First natural frequency, from 152.90 to 239.75 Hz

Modal · Harmonic · Transient shock · Random RMS · Fatigue screening

Bearing-cartridge tolerances — CAD model and simulation image thumbnailSOLIDWORKS assembly · Tolerance study

04 / Dimensional analysis

Bearing-cartridge tolerances

Connect the assembly section to a functional axial-clearance chain and compare worst-case, RSS and Monte Carlo assessments.

0.105–0.295 mmRevised worst-case clearance within the assumed 0.10–0.30 mm window

Assembly sections · Worst-case stack-up · RSS · Monte Carlo

Precision lifting stage — CAD model and simulation image thumbnailActual displacement result · Preliminary

06 / Assembly FEA

Precision lifting stage

Trace the load path through a lifting-stage assembly, including guide stiffness, contacts and bolted connections. Preliminary structural assessment.

0.1015 mmPredicted peak resultant displacement in the refined upper-travel case

17 solid bodies · 70 bolt connectors · Contact & spring idealizations

Robotic-gripper topology — CAD model and simulation image thumbnailActual optimized-solid stress result

07 / Optimization

Robotic-gripper topology

Move from topology optimization to an exported solid and a machining-oriented reconstruction, with a common static verification load.

27.9%Lower CAD mass for the machined candidate; displacement increases 41.3%

Protected interfaces · Topology optimization · Static verification

These portfolio studies demonstrate engineering methods under documented assumptions. Numerical predictions are conditional on the stated loads, materials, supports and verification limits. They are not physical test results or production certifications. Tolerance calculations are independent numerical analyses based on SOLIDWORKS geometry.

Simulation in motion

Study videos & animations.

Watch the behaviour behind the plots. This dedicated collection brings companion study videos together as new demonstrations are published.

01 / Nonlinear contact

Snap-lock insertion
and stress evolution.

Follow the latch as it bends against the receiver, passes through engagement and recovers. Read this companion animation alongside the nonlinear study for its model assumptions and interpretation.

Open video ↗

Result colours and deformation must be interpreted with each study’s legends and display scale. Illustrative animations are identified separately from solver-derived results.

Apply the method to your product

Have a design to evaluate?

Share your CAD, loads and design objectives so we can discuss a suitable assessment.

Discuss your project ↗

We use cookies to improve your experience.